BNG For The Benefit Of Mr Kite

(plus other species obviously, yes including the beetles)

The post that follows is just really an excuse for the title. Its initial title was going to be The Unbearable Lightness Of BNG, but that didn’t quite fit – for one thing the biodiversity net gain arrangements that we now have in draft are certainly not light.

So what do we now have? At this government page we have the following documents, all dated 29 November 2023, save where indicated:

What biodiversity net gain is:

Land manager guidance:

Developer guidance:

Local planning authority guidance:

Calculate a biodiversity value:

Legal agreements:

Habitat management and monitoring plans:

Planning practice guidance:

We also have four separate sets of draft Regulations:

There is also some useful Planning Advisory Service guidance, Biodiversity Net Gain in Development Management , including examples of developer guidance, planning conditions and section 106 clauses and template agreements.

My previous criticism of the slight delay that there has been in publishing all of this, ahead of the regime taking effect in January 2024 (April 2024 for small sites and November 2025 for NSIPs), was perhaps a little harsh…

Having skimmed only much of this documentation, what have I picked up?

Some exemptions:

(a) small developments where an application for planning permission is made or has been granted before April 2024,

(b) developments with no impact on priority habitat and where impacts on other habitat fall below specified thresholds (namely less than 25 square metres of habitat that has biodiversity value greater than zero and less than 5 metres in length of linear habitat),

(c) householder applications,

(d) HS2,

(e) off-site gain developments i.e. developments which fulfil the biodiversity net gain requirement arising in relation to another development, and

(f) certain self-build and custom build developments.

Detailed provisions about phased developments.

The regime will not catch section 73 applications where the parent permission predates the coming into effect of the regime.

Irreplaceable habitats” (which are not included in this regime – ie you cannot simply quantify the value of their loss and show a 10% net gain overall) are defined as including ancient woodlands and ancient/veteran trees.

Much detail as to how the register to be maintained by Natural England will operate.

Still no news as to which will be the “responsible bodies” with which owners will be able to enter into conservation covenants.

A solid step forward for the environment or just another technocratic “price of everything/value of nothing” system? Time will tell, but for now, in the words of Catriona Riddell’s least favourite band …

Let It BNG! This bird has flown. We can work it out. Strawberry fields forever.

Simon Ricketts, 2 December 2023

Personal views, et cetera

Red kite, courtesy of Wikipedia. (Where I live in west Hertfordshire, kites are these days such a common – and wonderful – sight).

Author: simonicity

Partner at boutique planning law firm, Town Legal LLP, but this blog represents my personal views only.

2 thoughts on “BNG For The Benefit Of Mr Kite”

  1. Hi Simon

    I have a query that I would like your take on about the exemption that applies to applications made before the implementation date of April 2024 as I am sure many LPA’s will take differing views.

    What counts as an application being ‘made’? Is it having been submitted to the council prior to April 2024, even a day before, or does the application have to be submitted and considered valid before then?

    Reading Part 3, Article 7 of the The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, it would imply that an application is ‘made’ when the application form is submitted along with plans and necessary information, either electronically or by paper.

    Due to most LPA’s taking 1-2 working weeks to get around to validating applications, I can envision that many will take the view that BNG requirements will then apply if an application submitted before April is invalidated for one reason or another (missing/incorrect fee or further documents related to a local validation list required).

    What do you think the correct legal view would be? Is there a definition of ‘made’ applications in legislation (I have had a look but could not find one)?

    Regards,

    Bill

    Like

    1. Hi Bill – apologies just saw this. My take on it is you just need an application to have been submitted that meets the legal validation requirements. No need to wait for validation. Simon

      Like

Leave a comment